How Communities Can Master Anticipatory Action Before Disasters Strike [Expert Guide]

Anticipatory action has proven to be a soaring win in 18 countries where communities now make better decisions before crises hit. The Kenya Red Cross Society's drought preparation initiatives and detailed early warning systems show how communities can stop displacement, prevent disease outbreaks, and protect their livelihoods through smart planning.

This piece will help your community become skilled at anticipatory action before disasters strike. You'll find practical steps, tools, and real-life applications to protect your community - whether you're just starting with disaster preparedness or looking to improve your existing systems.

Understanding Anticipatory Action: A Community Perspective

Communities handle disasters differently now. They don't wait for calamities to strike. People take action based on predicted hazards to reduce their effects on lives and livelihoods before disaster strikes. This new way of managing disasters helps save lives and builds stronger communities worldwide.

What is anticipatory action and why it matters

Anticipatory action helps communities take preventive steps based on forecasts and risk analysis. It tells them when, where, and how dangerous events might happen. The system works on three main elements:

• A pre-agreed trigger with thresholds and decision rules from reliable forecasts

• Pre-agreed activities that people can track, do, and trust

• Pre-arranged financing ready to use once triggers activate

This system fills a big gap in humanitarian aid. We can predict hazards and spot vulnerable areas better now. Yet most humanitarian groups only act after disasters happen. Money tells the same story - for every $10 spent on humanitarian relief, only $1 goes toward reducing and managing risks.

The system gives people dignity during disasters. Communities protect themselves instead of waiting for outside help. This self-reliant approach reduces their dependence on humanitarian aid.

The difference between reactive and anticipatory approaches

Think of reactive disaster management as an ambulance at the bottom of a cliff. It rushes in after people fall. Anticipatory action works like a fence at the cliff's edge. It stops people from falling.

The old reactive way kicks in after disaster strikes. It often faces delays from funding issues and logistics problems. Lives and livelihoods suffer needlessly. People end up selling assets and taking huge loans. This pushes them into greater hardship.

In stark comparison to this, anticipatory action lets communities make smart choices ahead of crises. Time and resources stay safe. People avoid displacement, disease, and lost income. The 2020 floods in Bangladesh showed this well. People who got early cash support were 12% less likely to borrow money or sell household assets than others.

The system also makes planning easier. Communities join in more because they can pick activities and providers early. Even if predicted dangers don't show up, communities stay better prepared for future threats.

Benefits of community-led anticipatory action

Local communities know their area best. They understand their land and specific challenges. They can act fast without the delays outside helpers face.

Local efforts respect cultural values too. Aid works better when it matches community beliefs and customs. People trust local leaders more. This helps them accept protective steps like evacuations or early harvests.

Local teams collect better data. When communities gather hazard prediction data through citizen science, they understand scientific information better. This knowledge enables action.

Local anticipatory action builds lasting strength. Communities learn to handle risks on their own. They need less outside help. This helps areas where natural hazards happen often.

This community-focused approach supports global goals like the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Yet 84% of local groups say they don't help assess their own risks or plan responses. This shows we need to invest more in community-led programs.

Assessing Disaster Risks in Your Community

A good risk assessment lays the groundwork to take action before disasters strike. Communities that take time to assess potential hazards can act quickly when needed. This saves lives and protects resources that matter.

Identifying local hazards and vulnerabilities

Your community's risk assessment starts with spotting all possible hazards in your area. You need to gather details about natural threats such as hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, and droughts, plus any human-made risks that could hit your community. Looking at past events gives you a clear picture - you should keep records of previous disasters and how bad they were.

Community Risk Assessment (CRA) works best when local people help spot the dangers. Different groups in your community face different risks - this includes women, people with disabilities, those without land, farmers, and fishing communities.

Put together a team that represents everyone in your community, especially those who don't usually get heard. Then hold group discussions to spot, break down, and agree on the risks in your area. This way, you combine scientific knowledge with local experience to get the full picture.

Mapping community assets and resources

Asset mapping helps community members list all resources they can use in emergencies. This shows what you have and what you still need to prepare better.

Here's what to look for when mapping resources:

• Physical assets: Places to evacuate, emergency shelters, medical facilities, and meeting spots

• Social assets: Local organizations, religious groups, volunteer networks, and informal help systems

• Environmental assets: Natural features that protect and help bounce back from disasters

• Knowledge assets: What people learned from past disasters, warning signs everyone knows, and local ways of coping

Local leaders should help with mapping since they know which places people trust and feel comfortable using. You also need to list transportation options because moving people quickly becomes a big challenge during evacuations.

Community members can draw simple maps showing where everything is, using basic materials and easy-to-understand symbols. After that, talk about how to use these resources in emergencies and find any gaps or overlaps in services.

Using simple risk assessment tools

Simple assessment methods don't need expert knowledge. The Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment (VCA) from the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies helps communities figure out their risks and strengths.

You can also put hazard maps on top of community maps to see which important places might be in danger. This helps spot what's at risk. To name just one example, see how a flood zone map shows which buildings and roads might go underwater at different levels.

Playing out "what if" situations helps predict problems, especially for rare but dangerous events. This works really well for hazards that haven't happened much before.

Check all information with community members to make sure it's right. The final assessment should be short, have pictures, and be easy to read - about ninth-grade level. Make sure to translate everything into languages your community speaks so everyone understands and feels part of it.

Taking time to assess risks with everyone involved helps communities create action plans that work for their specific situation and needs.

Building Effective Early Warning Systems

Early warning systems act as a community's nervous system that gives people significant time to protect themselves before disasters hit. These systems work best when they not only use sophisticated technology but also connect well with the people they want to protect.

Connecting to official forecast information

Getting reliable forecast information from trusted sources is the foundation of good early warnings. Scientific predictions from official weather services, geological monitoring agencies, and government emergency departments help communities prepare better for disasters.

FEMA's Integrated Public Alert & Warning System (IPAWS) shows how official warning networks can deliver emergency information through many channels at once - mobile phones, radio, television, and weather radio. This approach will give a better chance of reaching people whatever communication channels they prefer.

Practical steps for accessing official forecasts:

Start by identifying government agencies that monitor hazards in your area. Next, reach out to these agencies to learn about their alert types and how you can receive them. Last, pick community members who will check these sources and explain what they mean locally.

Emergency management officials should work with nearby jurisdictions, state agencies, and school districts before any crisis happens. This teamwork helps communities get clear information instead of mixed messages.

Creating community-based monitoring systems

Official forecasts cover broad areas, but community monitoring systems provide detailed local information in real-time. These range from basic observation networks to advanced sensor systems.

Communities in Nepal have tried different river monitoring technologies - from simple watchtowers to advanced LiDAR sensors - increasing warning lead times by up to 6 hours. Peru's communities use both simple rain gages made from plastic bottles and high-tech 3D-printed weather stations to get more accurate warnings.

Here's how to set up your community monitoring system:

1. Pick the most important hazards for your area based on your risk assessment

2. Choose monitoring tools that match your community's resources and skills

3. Train local volunteers to use these systems and understand their data

4. Set up trigger points that start specific actions when reached

Community monitoring works best when combined with official forecasts. Together they paint a detailed picture that neither could show alone.

Establishing alert communication channels

Warning distribution becomes the next vital step after spotting potential hazards. FEMA points out that emergency communications face bigger challenges than regular messages because they need immediate action and must work during stressful situations.

Creating multi-channel alert systems:

The best warning systems use several communication methods at once. Your community might benefit from social media, text messages, phone calls, emergency hotlines, radio, television, sirens, and physical signs.

Bangladesh's communities use local voice messaging to warn people about floods and tell them how to stay safe. This shows how warning channels should include both the alert and clear steps to take.

The Common Alerting Protocol (CAP) sets an international standard for emergency alerts that works across different systems. This helps make sure warnings tell people what the threat is, where it's happening, when it will hit, how bad it might be, and what they should do.

Early warning communications must reach everyone, including those who might be overlooked. This means thinking about language barriers, accessibility needs, and different levels of technology access. Thiès, Senegal's communities created special "EWS committees" to make sure warnings reach everyone at risk, showing how people networks can work alongside technology to protect everyone.

Well-designed early warning systems help communities turn risk awareness into action, giving them precious time to protect themselves before disasters strike.

Developing Your Community Anticipatory Action Plan

A decisive action plan that's well-laid-out helps communities respond to hazard warnings. This vital document changes forecasts into practical protective measures and changes how disasters affect vulnerable populations.

Setting triggers for action

Clearly defined triggers form the foundations of any anticipatory action framework. These pre-agreed thresholds and decision-making rules based on reliable forecasts help activate early actions without delays from lengthy emergency deliberations.

Triggers typically combine two vital elements:

1. Hazard thresholds: Technical parameters like predicted rainfall amounts, river levels, or wind speeds

2. Impact forecasting: Analysis linking these parameters to expected consequences for communities

A detailed risk analysis of relevant hazards starts the process of developing effective triggers. The analysis includes impact assessments of past events and vulnerability indicators. The core team identifies appropriate forecast sources, analyzes connections between hazard magnitude and potential impact, and establishes probability thresholds.

Madagascar's drought Early Action Protocol demonstrates this approach. It uses the WRSI index (Water Requirement Satisfaction Index) for upland rice to forecast potential food security impacts. Actions start at specific threshold levels. These defined triggers give teams the certainty needed for decisive anticipatory action.

Identifying early actions with maximum impact

The selection of early actions follows trigger establishment. These predefined activities alleviate disaster impacts when implemented before hazard arrival. These actions must be:

• Feasible within the available lead time between forecast and impact

• Influential in preventing or reducing acute humanitarian effects

• Cost-effective relative to the potential benefits

• Responsive to specific community vulnerabilities

Different hazards require different early actions. Flood response might include distributing water purification tablets, evacuating livestock, or reinforcing homes. Drought response often protects livelihoods through activities like distributing drought-resistant seeds or emergency animal feed.

Actions that protect both immediate survival needs and long-term recovery potential take priority. Implementation timing plays a significant role—some actions work just hours before impact, while others need weeks of lead time.

Assigning roles and responsibilities

Successful anticipatory action depends on clear accountability. The plan should detail who does what, when, and with what resources. The life-blood of this process involves mapping key stakeholders including:

• Community volunteers and leaders

• Local government representatives

• Technical experts from meteorological agencies

• Supporting organizations and NGOs

Your anticipatory action plan must specify forecast monitors, activation decision-makers, action implementers, and resource providers. Explicit documentation of these responsibilities prevents confusion during crisis moments.

Creating decision-making protocols

Step-by-step processes move teams from early warning to early action through:

1. Monitoring procedures: How and when forecasts are checked

2. Escalation pathways: Who receives alerts and how information flows

3. Validation processes: How warnings are confirmed before activation

4. Decision authority: Who authorizes action and resource deployment

Note that rigid protocols sometimes fail in faster evolving situations. A hybrid approach works best—combining structured decision frameworks with flexibility for local expertise. Some organizations use two-step triggers effectively. Initial warnings activate preliminary measures while teams confirm information before full deployment.

A complete anticipatory action plan with these four components positions communities to act decisively when warnings arise. The plan's success depends on implementing protective measures that save lives and livelihoods before disaster strikes.

Practical Anticipatory Action Tools for Communities

Communities need practical tools to put anticipatory action frameworks into practice and turn theory into life-saving action. Your next significant step after creating an anticipatory action plan is to pick the right tools that fit your community's resources, abilities, and specific hazard profile.

Low-cost monitoring equipment

Simple, economical monitoring devices have changed how communities track environmental hazards. These tools give extra time to take early actions and help local communities stay in control of the anticipatory action process.

Low-cost air pollution monitors use sensors to detect specific pollutants and environmental factors such as particulate matter, carbon dioxide, temperature, and humidity. These monitors cost just a few hundred dollars compared to traditional equipment. Communities can set up their own monitoring networks with these devices to get detailed local data that official monitoring might miss.

Communities in Nepal use different river monitoring technologies—from simple wattertowers to advanced sensors. This has increased warning times by up to 6 hours. Local citizens who help collect hazard prediction data understand scientific information better and feel more invested in taking action.

Here's what to look for in monitoring equipment:

• Pick devices that match your main hazards

• Think about power needs and maintenance

• Make sure community members can understand the data easily

• Put monitors in strategic spots based on vulnerability mapping

Note that low-cost sensors can't replace traditional regulatory monitors but they help expand hazard monitoring to areas that need it.

Mobile apps and digital solutions

Mobile technology brings special benefits to anticipatory action through widely available devices that quickly share critical information before disasters hit.

The AWARE platform shows this approach well. It uses mobile technology to send early warnings and connects communities to early action plans and funding. Users can access three key parts through their phones: early warning information, early action steps, and early finance allocation.

Mobile technology works especially well to share risk information. Haiti's CHANTER platform taught a twelve-week course about extreme weather preparation using SMS and interactive voice response. In Nepal, Naxa's DASTAA platform combines assessment tools to help make decisions about anticipatory action, which led to zero casualties during extreme rainfall.

These digital tools face challenges like low tech skills, limited phone access, and fewer women owning phones. You should check if digital approaches work for your situation to avoid making existing gaps bigger.

Paper-based planning templates

Paper documents are still great tools for communities building anticipatory action systems, especially where digital access is limited or power goes out.

FEMA provides useful templates, including Continuity Plan Templates for non-federal groups and community organizations. These documents show how to create complete continuity plans that communities can adjust for anticipatory action.

The Global Network of Civil Society Organizations for Disaster Reduction has created a Locally Led Anticipatory Action Guide and Toolkit with 14 special tools. These resources help civil society groups work with communities to build local anticipatory action systems.

Useful planning templates include:

• Gap and policy analysis tools to find helping and blocking factors

• Action planning and learning guides for group participation

• Early action review templates to check how well mechanisms, actions, and triggers work

Make sure paper tools use simple language at a ninth-grade reading level and get translated into local languages. These templates help turn complex anticipatory action ideas into real community plans.

Communities can build resilient anticipatory action systems that fit their needs by using these practical tools—monitoring equipment, digital solutions, and planning templates together.

Securing Resources for Anticipatory Action

Resource mobilization turns anticipatory action plans from theory into real-life solutions that save lives. The best-laid plans won't work without proper resources. Communities can take several strategic steps to get the support they need.

Community resource pooling strategies

Communities start successful anticipatory action by finding and organizing their existing resources. Village Civil Protection Committees have showed great results by storing resources specifically for disaster response as part of risk reduction. This preparation helps them respond quickly when early warning systems signal upcoming threats.

Communities excel at:

• Getting community members to work together

• Creating local funds and food reserves

• Making use of trained community structures

• Following good governance practices

• Using better farming techniques

Local resource options often include community businesses, piece work (ganyu), irrigation farming, safety net programs, and youth activities. These methods help communities stand on their own feet and need less outside help.

Accessing external funding sources

More external funding options for anticipatory action are accessible to communities now. The Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF) has grown to support anticipatory action pilot projects. These funds work alongside core funding through the Rapid Response and Underfunded Emergencies windows.

Anticipatory action funding guarantees resources before disasters hit. Communities can make strong plans and take action with confidence between the forecast and actual impact. Your funding requests should highlight how your anticipatory action framework tackles specific community vulnerabilities.

Building partnerships with local government

Local governments play a vital role in anticipatory action efforts. Start by finding local emergency response organizations and getting them involved in your planning. Community-based organizations bring valuable resources and leadership during emergencies.

Memoranda of understanding (MOUs) make these partnerships official. They spell out organizational details, roles, responsibilities, and operating principles. These agreements create clear processes for working together and hold everyone accountable.

FEMA keeps state and local-level lists of community leaders and organizations that help with emergency management on the ground. You can also join your local Community Emergency Response Team (CERT) to gain community insights and learn valuable skills.

These partnerships give communities access to more resources. They also make sure anticipatory action plans fit with bigger emergency management systems. This teamwork leads to better results without duplicating efforts.

Implementing Anticipatory Actions: Real-World Examples

Ground results show the true value of anticipatory action frameworks that deliver tangible results in a variety of hazard situations. These examples highlight how communities have turned planning into actions that save lives.

Flood preparedness actions

The Red Crescent Society in Bangladesh activated anticipatory action funds before peak monsoon flooding in 2020. They provided essential supplies to 36,500 people in 192 shelters. Their quick response helped people and about 4,400 livestock reach safety before disaster struck. People in shelters with anticipatory support received better water and sanitation supplies. They faced fewer problems at cyclone shelters and reported better health right after the emergency.

Zambia faced devastating floods in 2023 that displaced over 25,768 households. The communities there now use the AWARE Platform that links early warning systems with pre-positioned resources. Their simulations showed vulnerable communities received mosquito nets, water containers, chlorine for purification, sleeping mats, and soap. These actions protect people's health when floods threaten.

Drought mitigation measures

Actions to prepare for drought focus on saving water resources and protecting farmers' livelihoods. Niger activated drought preparation in August 2022 after seeing below-average rainfall. They helped 48,000 smallholder farmers expand water-harvesting activities in 90,000 small catchments over 1,700 hectares. The farmers received drought-resistant agricultural supplies while 6,000 households got cash transfers.

FEMA suggests communities should protect stream corridors, conserve wetlands, store aquifer water, and build green infrastructure to reduce drought effects. Good drought planning includes early water conservation, proper fertilization techniques, no-till systems, and crop rotation strategies.

Cyclone/hurricane readiness

Start Network's tropical cyclone model in Madagascar shows how trigger-based anticipatory action works effectively. Their system activates when wind speeds hit 166 km/h up to 72 hours before predicted landfall. This method raised alerts for Cyclone Batsirai four days before landfall and released £419,046 (approximately $562,000) for actions that helped 41,559 people.

Mercy Corps tested a new Remittances for Anticipatory Action model in Central America. They worked with digital financial service providers to send early warning messages and financial incentives to remittance senders in the US. This helped recipients in vulnerable areas prepare for predicted tropical cyclones and ended up changing negative adaptation patterns for 79.1% of the community.

Measuring Success and Learning from Experience

Measuring results is the life-blood of effective anticipatory action frameworks. This helps communities confirm their approaches and improve their disaster preparedness efforts. A resilient evaluation system justifies resource investments and builds evidence needed to scale anticipatory action globally.

Simple monitoring and evaluation methods

Good monitoring starts by measuring what matters instead of collecting too much data. Quality beats quantity—systems with fewer indicators but reliable data work better than complex models. The evidence base for anticipatory action stays limited, which makes rigorous evaluation methods crucial.

Many practitioners find quasi-experimental approaches work well, especially when you have to compare outcomes between:

• Anticipatory action beneficiaries

• Similarly vulnerable households who received only traditional disaster response

This method lets communities determine if anticipatory actions really made a difference in reducing disaster effects. These evaluations help answer whether forecast-based financing reaches vulnerable populations when needed.

Documenting and sharing community knowledge

Community insights are a great way to get resources that need systematic capture and sharing. Documentation should focus on:

• Successes and failures to promote honest learning

• Local views on what worked and why

• Collateral damage that emerged during implementation

The Success Case Method gives communities with limited resources a practical approach. It identifies both successful and unsuccessful cases through surveys and detailed interviews. Communities can understand why certain anticipatory actions worked while others failed without needing complex statistical knowledge.

Continuous improvement strategies

Continuous improvement needs transparency about forecast limitations and trigger mechanisms. Communities should be clear about forecast accuracy while managing expectations. Regular review sessions after activations help identify ways to adjust anticipatory action plans.

Learning workshops create structured opportunities to analyze successes, failures, and process improvements. These reflective practices create institutional memory and prevent repeated mistakes in future activations.

Measuring success isn't about proving anticipatory action perfect. It focuses on honest assessment of effectiveness and making needed changes. Communities that document their experiences systematically add to the growing global understanding of how anticipatory action serves vulnerable populations best.

My Final Words

Anticipatory action has proven to change how communities handle disasters. This proactive strategy helps communities protect lives and livelihoods before threats appear. Bangladesh, Niger, and Madagascar showcase the real-life effects of well-designed anticipatory frameworks that communities have implemented.

Your community's trip into anticipatory action needs four key elements. A full picture of risks comes first, followed by reliable early warning systems. Clear action protocols and secured resources complete the foundation. These elements create a strong framework that saves lives and builds lasting resilience.

The path to make anticipatory action work demands dedication. Your community doesn't need to face this challenge alone. Our team provides guidance on implementing anticipatory frameworks that fit your local context. You can reach us at contact@imranahmed.tech.

Anticipatory action means more than preparing for disasters. It ended up creating a radical alteration toward proactive, dignity-centered humanitarian response. Communities can build resilience to face future challenges confidently through careful planning, resource gathering, and continuous learning.

FAQs

Q1. What is anticipatory action in disaster management? Anticipatory action is a proactive approach that involves taking measures before a predicted hazard occurs to prevent or reduce its humanitarian impact. It utilizes forecasts and risk analysis to trigger pre-agreed actions and funding, allowing communities to protect lives and livelihoods before a disaster fully unfolds.

Q2. How can communities prepare for disasters effectively? Communities can prepare for disasters by conducting thorough risk assessments, establishing early warning systems, developing clear action protocols, and securing necessary resources. This includes creating emergency kits, evacuation plans, and staying informed about local risks and response strategies.

Q3. What are some examples of successful anticipatory actions? Successful anticipatory actions include pre-emptive evacuations and supply distribution before floods in Bangladesh, drought mitigation measures like water harvesting in Niger, and early cyclone preparedness activities in Madagascar. These actions have demonstrably reduced the impact of disasters on vulnerable populations.

Q4. How can communities measure the success of their anticipatory action efforts? Communities can measure success through simple monitoring and evaluation methods, such as comparing outcomes between anticipatory action beneficiaries and those who received only traditional disaster response. Documenting local knowledge, conducting regular reviews, and holding learning workshops are also crucial for continuous improvement.

Q5. What resources are available for communities to implement anticipatory action? Communities can access various resources for anticipatory action, including community resource pooling strategies, external funding sources like the Central Emergency Response Fund (CERF), and partnerships with local government. Additionally, practical tools such as low-cost monitoring equipment, mobile apps, and planning templates can support implementation efforts.

References

[1] - https://www.civicplus.com/blog/ps/local-government-community-emergency-preparedness/
[2] - https://www.chaberlin.org/en/blog/building-on-local-knowledge-and-partnerships-to-facilitate-trigger-development-and-scale-up-anticipatory-action/
[3] - https://www.enterprisecommunity.org/learning-center/resources/how-conduct-community-risk-assessment
[4] - https://www.ncoa.org/article/emergency-preparedness-for-community-based-organizations-delivering-evidence-based-programs/
[5] - https://www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/national-preparedness/plan/community-engagement-toolkit/section-1/build-partnerships
[6] - https://www.gndr.org/locally-led-anticipatory-action-guide-toolkit/
[7] - http://proventionconsortium.net/?pageid=39
[8] - https://www.droughtmanagement.info/pillars/mitigation-preparedness-response/
[9] - https://www.adaptation-undp.org/sites/default/files/resources/cra_guidelines_english.pdf
[10] - https://www.anticipation-hub.org/Documents/Manuals_and_Guidelines/WFP-FbF-MEGuide-Oct2021.pdf
[11] - https://www.preventionweb.net/drr-community-voices/learning-and-improving-evidence-base-anticipatory-action
[12] - https://www.cadri.net/system/files/2021-09/CADRI%20-%20Good%20Practices%20-%20CBDRM_2020.pdf
[13] - https://www.preventionweb.net/drr-community-voices/well-designed-triggers-support-decision-making-anticipatory-action
[14] - https://www.anticipation-hub.org/experience/triggers/trigger-database/trigger-list
[15] - https://www.welthungerhilfe.org/our-work/focus-areas/humanitarian-assistance/anticipatory-action
[16] - https://www.epa.gov/indoor-air-quality-iaq/low-cost-air-pollution-monitors-and-indoor-air-quality
[17] - https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2024/03/as-threats-to-air-quality-rise-communities-deploy-low-cost-air-monitoring-networks/
[18] - https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/connectivity-for-good/mobile-for-development/blog/mobile-enabled-anticipatory-action-and-early-warning-systems-the-gsma-and-fcdo-visit-kathmandu-as-part-of-digital-humanitarian-partnership/
[19] - https://www.gbuapcd.org/AirMonitoringData/LowCostSensors/
[20] - https://www.preventionweb.net/news/aware-digitally-enabled-governance-platform-effective-anticipatory-action-ahead-climate-shocks
[21] - https://www.gsma.com/solutions-and-impact/connectivity-for-good/mobile-for-development/blog/mobile-innovation-in-anticipatory-humanitarian-action/
[22] - https://www.fema.gov/emergency-managers/national-preparedness/continuity/templates
[23] - https://alnap.org/help-library/resources/community-led-resource-mobilization-early-warning-systems-process-assessment-titukulane/
[24] - https://cerf.un.org/anticipatory-action
[25] - https://www.anticipation-hub.org/experience/financing
[26] - https://odihpn.org/publication/the-effectiveness-of-anticipatory-humanitarian-action-for-cyclone-response-in-bangladesh/
[27] - https://www.iwmi.org/blogs/lessons-from-flood-anticipatory-action-in-zambia/
[28] - https://www.anticipation-hub.org/Documents/Briefing/short-overview-of-anticipatory-action.pdf
[29] - https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/documents/fema_drought-planning-fact-sheet_092021.pdf
[30] - https://www.anticipation-hub.org/news/anticipating-tropical-cyclones-in-madagascar-start-networks-experience
[31] - https://www.mercycorps.org/research-resources/anticipatory-action-lessons-hurricane-seasons
[32] - https://www.anticipation-hub.org/learn/lessons-learnt
[33] - https://www.wfp.org/publications/monitoring-and-evaluation-anticipatory-actions-fast-and-slow-onset-hazards-guidance
[34] - https://www.anticipation-hub.org/news/new-comprehensive-guidance-for-monitoring-and-evaluating-anticipatory-action
[35] - https://www.preventionweb.net/news/impact-assessment-shoestring-exploring-alternative-methodologies-anticipatory-action-evidence
[36] - https://www.unocha.org/anticipatory-action
[37] - https://www.anticipation-hub.org/about/what-is-anticipatory-action
[38] - https://www.iom.int/anticipatory-action
[39] - https://www.anticipation-hub.org/news/how-does-anticipatory-action-contribute-to-building-resilience
[40] - https://www.preventionweb.net/understanding-disaster-risk/key-concepts/anticipatory-action
[41] - https://www.anticipation-hub.org/Documents/Briefing_Sheets_and_Fact_Sheets/Locally_led_anticipatory_action_Briefing.pdf
[42] - https://www.preventionweb.net/news/strengthening-locally-led-anticipatory-action-pakistan
[43] - https://www.mdcinc.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Community-Based-Vulnerability-Assessment.pdf
[44] - https://socialwelfare.vikaspedia.in/viewcontent/social-welfare/disaster-management-1/psychosocial-preparedness/resource-mapping?lgn=en
[45] - https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.06.16.20129635v1.full-text

How Local Communities Cut Heat Wave Deaths by 60% – South Asia’s Early Warning System

For a regional overview, explore how South Asian countries are building stronger anticipatory systems and how early warning systems reduced fatalities. Also, read how to implement anticipatory response on the ground.

How South Asian Nations Are Building Stronger Anticipatory Action Systems

Learn how local communities are putting early warning systems into action and how to implement response frameworks effectively. To build triggers for action, check out this step-by-step guide for drought scenarios.

How to Design Effective Anticipatory Response Indicators – A Field Guide for Humanitarian Teams

Make your indicators impactful by linking them with real-world application: implement anticipatory response strategies, build drought triggers, and learn from how communities lead anticipatory action.